Ruling on extracting a confessionWho is accused of force, Religion and law

Abstract

Extracting a confession by force during detention and investigation against some people, as soon as they are accused of committing a crime or any act punishable by law, is considered legally and legally unacceptable. The means of extracting confessions from detainees have become extremely cruel and unimaginable. Right and wrong have become mixed. Laws and laws guaranteed the rights of offenders, although they would inevitably be punished. So what about the accused who has not been proven guilty, as coercion and torture to confess have become one of the means used to reach the truth, and this may have led to the accused being forced to confess falsely to himself, because the punishment for the crime may be less severe than the means of torture in the investigation, and it is known that no There is stronger evidence than a person's self-confidence. Due to the importance of the topic, I highlighted this phenomenon due to its religious, legal, cultural, moral and humanitarian dimensions, and we cannot fail to state the acceptable limits for using a disciplined method to extract confession, in a way that ensures that human dignity, freedom and rights guaranteed by divine and man-made laws are not infringed.