The principle of Legality in the Criminal law in the Case law of The European Court of Human Rights

Authors

  • أ.م.د. رافد خيون دبيسان Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61279/7veg6m92

Keywords:

crimes, penalties, criminal legitimacy, European Court, human rights

Abstract

The principle of the legality of crimes and punishments became consistent with the modern penal code, and there is no doubt that it emerged at the invitation of many philosophers of the Age of Enlightenment, who paid great attention to it, so it began to be coherent in the Russian, American and French penal code, and with the passage of time it came He became mature and prosperous, and inclined to adhere to covenants. universality and international agreements, following World War II, until they became a prominent principle, It joins the first paragraph of Article Seven, and hides in the shadow of the shadow of the European Convention on Human Rights.
(The principle of the legality of crimes and punishments in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights), in order to clarify the significance attached to the purposes of its definition, and to clarify the justifications for its coverage and inclusion in its aspects, and because of Article M A study that supports the preparation of scientific research that supports the theory of this principle in the legal lesson.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

أولا- المصادر العربية:

الكتب:

- د. علي حسين الخلف ود. سلطان عبد القادر الشاوي، المبادئ العامة لقانون العقوبات، مكتبة السنهوري، بدون رقم الطبعة.

البحوث:

د. حابس الفواعرة، احترام مبدأ شرعية الجرائم والعقوبات بين التشريع والقضاء، مجلة الحقوق والعلوم الإنسانية، المجلد الحادي عاشر.

د. عادل علي المانع، الأمن القانوني الجنائي مفهومه وأساسه، مجلة الأمن والحياة، كلية الحقوق جامعة الكويت، العدد 248.

د. علي عبد القادر القهوجي، مبدأ شرعية الجرائم والعقوبات في القانون الدولي الجنائي، مجلة كلية القانون الكويت العالمية.

جواهر الحبور، السلطة التقديرية للقاضي في إصدار العقوبة بين حديها الأدنى والأعلى، جامعة الشرق الأوسط، كلية للحقوق جامعة الشرق الأوسط.

References

- Books:

-1Valsmis Mitsilgas, EU Criminal Law, Oxofrd and Portland, Hart Publishing, USA & Canada, 2009.

-2 Merita Kettunen, Legitimizing European Criminal Law Justification and Restrictions, Comparative, European & International Criminal Justice, Springer, volume 2, 2020.

- Researches:

-1 Cian C. Murphy, The Principle of Legality in Criminal Law under the ECHR, European Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 2, p. 192, 2010.

-2 Cherneva Boyka Ivaylova, Legal Security as a Principle in Lawmaking, State and the Individual, No 2(14), 2017.

-3 Daniel Grădinaru, The Principle of Legality, RAIS Conference Proceedings - The 11th International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences.

-4 Rollin M. Perkins, The Territorial Principle in Criminal Law, 22 Hastings L.J, 1971, 1155.

- Article:

-1 Analogy and Analogical Reasoning, Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy, 2013, the link:

((https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reasoninganalogy/#:~:text=An%20analogy%20is%20a%20comparison,that%20relies%20upon%20an%20analogy)).

-2 What is the European Court of Human Rights?, Equality and Human Rights Commission, the link:

((https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/what-are-human-rights/how-are-your-rights-protected/what-european-court-human-rights)).

-3 The principle of legality in the Criminal law, Up Counsel, the link:

((https://www.upcounsel.com/lectl-the-principle-of-legality-in-the-criminal-law)).

- Guides:

-1 Guide for Article 7, the European Court of Human Rights, 2021.

- The European Court of Human rights Cases:

-1 Cantoni v. France, the European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 17862/9, 1996.

-2 Custers, Deveaux and Turk v Denmark, the European Court of Human Rights, applications no. 11843/03,11847/03 and 11849/03, 2007.

-3 G. v. France, the European Court of Human Rights, (Application no. 15312/89), 1995.

-4 G.I.E.M. S.R.L. and Others v. Italy, the European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 1828/06, 2018.

-5 Jamil v. France, the European Court of Human Rights, applications no. 11/1994/458/539, 1989.

-6 lnseher v. Germany ,The European Court of Human Rights, Applications no.10211/12 and 27505/14.

-7 Jorgic v Germany, the European Court of Human Rights, application no. 74613/01, 2007 &

-8 Kafkaris v Cyprus, the European Court of Human Rights, applicant no. 21906/04, 2004.

-9 Kokkinakis v. Greece, the European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 14307/88, 1993.

-10 Kononov v. Latvia, The European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 36376/04, 2010.

-11 Korbely v. Hungary, the European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 9174/02, 2008.

-12 M. v. Germany, the European Court of Human Rights, (Application no. 19359/04), 2009.

-13 Sud Fondi srl and Others v. Italy, the European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 75909/01, 2007.

-14 SW & CR v UK, The European Court of Human Rights, Applications no. 20166/92, 1995.

-15 Welch v UK, The European Court of Human Rights, application no. 17440/90 ,1995.

-16 Vasiliauskas v. Lithuania, the European court of Human Rights, Application no. 35343/05, 2015.

- The house of Lords:1- Regina v R (Marital Rape Exemption) [1992] 1 AC 599. Sources

Books:

-1Ali Hussein Al-Khalaf, Dr. Sultan Abdul Qadir Al-Shawi, General Principles of Penal Law, Al-Sanhouri Library, without edition number.

Research:

-1 Habes Al-Fawaara, Respecting the Principle of Legitimacy of Crimes and Punishments between Legislation and the Judiciary, Journal of Law and Human Sciences, Volume Eleven.

-2 Adel Ali Al-Manea, Criminal Legal Security: Its Concept and Basis, Security and Life Magazine, Faculty of Law, Kuwait University, No. 248.

-3 Ali Abdul Qader Al-Qahwaji, The Principle of Legitimacy of Crimes and Punishments in International Criminal Law, Kuwait International Law College Journal.

-4Jawaher Al-Habour, The Judge’s Discretionary Power in Issuing a Sentence Between the Minimum and Maximum Limits, Middle East University, Faculty of Law, Middle East University.

Downloads

Published

19-12-2024